Saturday, June 13, 2009

Slightly Off Topic: What Blurbs REALLY Say About a Book

How much stock do you put in the blurbs on a book cover? You know, the ones from other people (typically professional book reviewers, authors, or other celebs) who have read the book, saying things like "fantastic, sweeping narrative," "a great novel of our times," or "I just couldn't put it down!" Do you pay attention to them? I think they're interesting, not so much because of what's said (they often seem cut and pasted from one book to another) and more because of who says it. I think who is chosen to advocate for a book can be pretty telling.

Before I get started, please note that these occasional rants of mine are not based on any special knowledge of publishing, but rather on my own personal opinions and impressions.

Take as an example a book I finished recently, Tatsea by Armin Wiebe. The sole blurb on the book cover is from a school counsellor in Wha Ti (where the book is set, a couple hundred years earlier) . On the author's website there are a few more blurbs. One is from a cellist in a youth orchestra. This makes me think Mr. Wiebe is having a tough time publicizing his book, or is gearing it towards a very specific niche market. This is really too bad, because the book is fantastic! (Check out my review here)

My favorite blurbs are from authors that I like. For example, every book I've read that is recommended by Stephenie Meyer, I have loved. The Hunger Games, The Mortal Instruments series, Austenland, The Girl Who Could Fly... all great books. Tamora Pierce has recommended some great books, though I can't remember any examples right now. So I guess if you like an author's writing style, there's a good chance you'll like their reading choices.

When I read B As In Beauty, I noticed that almost all the blurbs on the cover were from celebs like Daisy Fuentes. I don't quite know what to think of these blurbs. I guess it's no different than someone like me telling you I liked a book, or trading on the celebrity status of an author like Stephenie Meyer, but it feels more contrived to me.

Finally, you have the blurbs written by traditional journalists. You know, the ones from Time Magazine, The Globe and Mail, The New Yorker and the like. This is going to sound terrible, but I usually don't even read these blurbs. They may be a good indicator of whether the book will win lots of awards, but in my experience they are a terrible indicator of whether I will enjoy reading the book. Also I frequently feel like the author of the blurb is just trying to sound smart, and that drives me crazy. Another reason why I love book blogs! (Check out my post about book reviews in general)

Well, I hope you enjoyed my little post today. What do you think? Do you read the blurbs on book covers? Which ones do you give the most credence to?

9 comments:

beth said...

I'm the same way: a blurb from an author I like is gold and rarely fails (much like how a blurb from an author I DON'T like is usually an indication I WON'T like the book). Newspapers = fail. I feel as if they're too easily bought to write a great blurb. Anyone else--I don't bother reading them.

lifeafterjane said...

I can't stand seeing a blurb from an author I don't like on the cover of a book that I do like. I tend to be protective of the books and authors I enjoy and even though I know other people may like the author doing the blurb it just makes me angry to see their name on MY BOOK.

L. Diane Wolfe said...

Thanks for giving a reader's perspective on blurbs!
BTW - great blurbs are tougher to acquire for mid-list authors. Although a blurb from your favorite best-selling author may be more canned & contrived than you think.

L. Diane Wolfe
www.circleoffriendsbooks.blogspot.com
www.spunkonastick.net
www.thecircleoffriends.net

Kaye said...

I basically don't pay any attention to them. I feel they are getting paid to write it or they are from the same publishing house and their editors ask them to do it.

Callie said...

Although I do like to read the blurbs, they don't really sweep me into buying or reading the book.
I agree with Kaye-- I think alot of blurbs are not the authors honest feelings about the book because I think they are sent the books and told to read them, and then pressured to say something good about them. When they may not even in fact like the book. This is a really interesting post!

Ladybug said...

Great post, NotNessie! I agree with you, especially about reviewers in large newspapers etc. I have to check out a couple of the books that you mentioned Stephenie Meyer had recommended. If I remember correct she also recommended Wicked Lovely which I just read and enjoyed. I've read The Hunger Games as well, my best read so far this year.

Now I'm off to read the two post you've linked to(I'm very curios about the review of Tatsea).

I got an award waiting for you here.

Juju said...

I never listen to blurbs. I put much more weight on blogs like yours or Shelfari.

Mardel said...

I don't pay much attention to publisher or editorial blurbs because I think that sometimes key words are left out. You can make a positive blurb out of a negative review that way. If I see a blurb from an author I really enjoy, then I'll look at the book, but that doesn't make me buy it, for the same reason stated before. When there are a lot of "...." then it's a good bet that key words were left out, on purpose to make it look better. So a positive blurb from an author I like will make me look at the book, then maybe read a few pages to see if I'll like it.

Laina said...

I just want to know what it's about, save the reviews for review sites and those first pages at the front of the books (happens in some books I've read), I don't really want to know what people think on the back, I just want to know what it's about so I can see if I want to read it.